馬刺花費已經這麼精打細算還虧錢 真的令人意外
看來只能賣LA了 哈哈 作者: 許廷鏗 時間: 2017-9-21 01:54 AM
財政上可能虧 但有些球隊要榮耀不要錢 對他們來說就是賺了作者: visit999 時間: 2017-9-21 03:02 AM
本帖最後由 visit999 於 2017-9-21 03:24 AM 編輯
There is a mistake in the translation: "..其中有9支球隊就算能獲得豪華稅分紅.." It should be "..其中有9支球隊就算能獲得收入分享(revenue-sharing)分紅.." because luxury taxes are only one part of the total revenue sharing pool and there are other parts including the box office incomes etc.
BTW, in the 2015~16 season, only 3 teams (from memory, correct me if I am wrong) lost money. In the 2016-17 season, almost all teams have increased their payrolls substantially, and that is the main reason why more teams are losing money. The nba players are the real beneficiary of the past season.
However, luxury taxes will increase a lot in the coming seasons for many teams (e.g. GSW, OKC, Cavs etc.) so the revenue sharing pool will be much bigger in the coming seasons, which means more revenues for the smaller teams. However, I am sure the smaller market teams will want the big market teams to contribute more, especially their TV broadcast revenues, in the upcoming nba meeting to discuss this issue. 作者: lp7717007 時間: 2017-9-21 09:12 AM
這就是現實了
不知情況繼續惡化下去
會不會有球隊收起來作者: sarry0618 時間: 2017-9-21 09:27 AM
怕熱就不要進廚房投資前請詳閱公開說明書作者: donkachi 時間: 2017-9-21 09:41 AM
閉眼也知道 騎士那種課金方式一定榜上有名作者: jordan23jordan 時間: 2017-9-21 09:59 AM
